Legal Opinion
Sturman v. Socha
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 1983No. 10163PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant Edward Socha having been found individually liable to the plaintiff pursuant to a contract between the parties for an unpaid bill in the amount of $4093.60 for services rendered to Michael Socha, the defendant’s father, has appealed to this court. On appeal he claims: (1) that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for exemption from the trial list; and (2) that the trial court erred in finding that he was personally liable on the agreement sued upon.
At trial, the following facts were disclosed: Prior to December, 1971, the defendant’s father had become a victim…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.