Legal Opinion
Cavallo v. Lewis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 8, 1984No. (2207)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment denying the defendant’s motion to dissolve an ex parte prejudgment attachment of certain real estate. The underlying action involves a dispute as to the existence of a contract under which the defendant allegedly agreed to sell residential property to the plaintiffs.
In considering an application for a prejudgment remedy, the trial court must determine whether there is probable cause to sustain the validity of the plaintiffs’ claim. General Statutes § 52-278d; McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd., 185 Conn. 37, 39, 440 A.2d 801 (1981); Self-Service…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Randolph Construction Co. v. Kings East CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Simses v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- LeBlanc v. New England Raceway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Krondes v. O'BoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Shaw v. Greenwich Anesthesiology Associates, PCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Steinberg v. RedingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.