Legal Opinion
New England Whalers Hockey Club v. Nair
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 1, 1984No. (2088)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTesto, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant entered into three separate advertising contracts. The defendant is an advertising agent who operates under the name Ad Infinitum from his home. All negotiations relative to these contracts were conducted between the defendant and William Rasmussen, a former employee of the plaintiff. The contracts called for the plaintiff to provide advertising services for a Grinold Auto Parts, Inc.
The first contract, dated February 6, 1976, was for a one eighth sponsorship in ten games in the plaintiffs radio broadcasts for the 1975-1976 hockey season. The second contract,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- In re Nicolina T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Comind, Companhia De Seguros v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- Goold v. GooldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.