Legal Opinion
Glanz v. Testa
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 8, 1986No. 12805PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The narrow issue in this appeal is whether a trial court at a hearing on a motion to dissolve an *407ex parte prejudgment real estate attachment is limited to an examination of probable cause as presented in the supporting affidavit to the prejudgment remedy application. The plaintiff, Myron L. Glanz, and the defendants, James Testa and John Bartus, allegedly created a partnership in order to develop property located in East Windsor. On August 9,1983, the plaintiff brought this action against the defendants for breach of various fiduciary duties and confidential relationships, claiming that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Kukanskis v. GriffithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Fermont Division v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Self-Service Sales Corp. v. HeinzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Lengyel & Lengyel Builders, Inc. v. HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People's Bank v. Bilmor Building Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. B. W. Beardsley, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Doe v. RapoportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Banks v. VitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.