Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1974No. 73-582PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The issue in this case is the validity under the Federal Constitution of Ordinance No. 704, which was enacted by the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, City Council in December 1969, and which placed a 20% tax on the gross receipts obtained from all transactions involving the parking or storing of a motor vehicle at a nonresidential parking place in return for a consideration.1 The ordinance *371superseded a 1968 ordinance imposing an identical tax, but at the rate of 15%, which in turn followed a tax at the rate of 10% imposed by the city in 1962. Soon after its enactment, 12 operators of offstreet…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API