Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue v. Andrade

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2001No. S-9329, S-9339PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We addressed the constitutionality of exclusion of illegal aliens from permanent fund dividend (PFD) eligibility in State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. Cosio. 1 We suggested in Cosio that there may be a class of legal aliens that has a valid constitutional challenge as to eligibility for a permanent fund dividend. This case presents that challenge and asks whether the language of AS 43.28.005(a)(5)(B), which restricts alien PFD eligibility to those who are "lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States,"…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API