State, Department of Revenue v. Andrade
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
We addressed the constitutionality of exclusion of illegal aliens from permanent fund dividend (PFD) eligibility in State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. Cosio. 1 We suggested in Cosio that there may be a class of legal aliens that has a valid constitutional challenge as to eligibility for a permanent fund dividend. This case presents that challenge and asks whether the language of AS 43.28.005(a)(5)(B), which restricts alien PFD eligibility to those who are "lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States,"…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.