Legal Opinion

Enders v. Parker

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2003No. S-9341, S-9391PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION 1

Iris Enders unsuccessfully challenged the admission into probate of Joel Kottke's 1997 will, which named his companion Connie Parker as personal representative, on the grounds of undue influence and insane delusions. We previously upheld the superior court's rejection of that challenge.

Iris Enders now appeals the superior court's denial of her AS 18.16.485 claim for *13costs and attorney's fees arising out of her unsuccessful prosecution of the will contest. Connie Parker cross-appeals the superior court's refusal to award her attorney's…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. J & L Diversified Enterprises, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Paskvan v. MesichAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Crittell v. BingoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Catalina Yachts v. PierceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Marshall v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API