Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 24, 1969No. C.D. 3853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The issue in this case is the proper tariff classification of certain 20-key and 22-fcey accordions that were imported from Italy and entered at the port of New York. The articles were classified by the government under item 737.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202) as toy musical instruments, dutiable at 26 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff challenges this classification, claim*719ing that the importations are not toy musical instruments but rather are musical instruments which are properly classifiable under item 725.14 as piano accordions at the rate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. International Customs Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ero Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Venaire Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. American Rusch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Associated Consumers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API