Legal Opinion

International Customs Service, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 4, 1969No. C.D. 3843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, was manufactured in Switzerland and is described on the invoices as wire Heatsink tools. It was assessed with duty at 37 per centum ad valorem under item 649.91 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as tweezers. It is claimed that the merchandise is dutiable either under item 651.47 at 17 per centum ad valorem, as other hand tools of iron or steel, or under item 648.85 at 3I/3 cents each and 20 per centum ad valorem, as other pliers, nippers, pincers, and hinged tools, for holding and splicing wire.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Great Western Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Brager-Larsen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Swift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Associated Hobby Mfrs., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API