Legal Opinion
Ero Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 20, 2000No. SLIP OP. 00-138; 98-01-00053PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WATSON, Senior Judge.
INTRODUCTION
At issue is the proper classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) for certain merchandise imported by plaintiff from China which is described in the commercial invoices and other entry documents as “playhouses,” “play or slumber tents,” and “vehicle tents” (collectively, the “imports” or the “subject merchandise”). The subject merchandise comprises tent-like articles that include a vinyl shell having colorfully imprinted on the exterior licensed copyrighted and trademarked graphics depicting various…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Processed Plastic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Filmtec Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Simon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Uniden America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Toy Biz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.