Legal Opinion

Schwarting v. Artel

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1940No. Civ. 12659PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants, denying plaintiffs’ suit to impress a trust upon certain real property and for an accounting, plaintiffs appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal is based upon the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and judgment, an intimate familiarity with the facts will enliven the understanding and increase the appreciation of the conclusion at which we have arrived. After the entry of judgment defendant John G. Artel departed this life and his administrator was substituted in his place. All references are to decedent and not to the administrator.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Curry v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Thompson v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Kirk White & Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Timmsen v. Forest E. Olson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API