Legal Opinion

Kirk White & Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1935No. Civ. 9739PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action instituted by it to recover damages arising from an alleged wrongful release of an attachment and subsequent conversion by defendants of the personal property so released.

The facts shown in the evidence and as found by the trial court, in so far as they are pertinent herein, are as follows: On June 24, 1931, plaintiff commenced an action against one Clarence M. Wold to recover the sum of $7,000 with interest and attorneys’ fees on a promissory note, and on the same date caused a writ of attachment to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kinert v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Schwarting v. ArtelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Norman v. BurksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API