Legal Opinion
Timmsen v. Forest E. Olson, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1970No. Civ. 34633PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHWEITZER, J.
Action for damages for breach of real estate brokers’ fiduciary obligation to their principals. Appeal by plaintiffs from judgment of nonsuit after completion of opening statement by plaintiffs’ attorney. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581c.) For the purpose of the motion for nonsuit counsel stipulated that the statement of facts set forth in plaintiffs’ trial brief would be deemed to be the opening statement of counsel for plaintiffs.
The Opening Statement Summarized
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, owned a residence in Van Nuys. They were in their sixties, and were inexperienced and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Rianda v. San Benito Title Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Stephan v. ProctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Consolidated World Investments, Inc. v. Lido Preferred Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Brown v. CritchfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.