Curry v. King
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. H. Welsh, J. F. Pryor, and N. C. Coldwell, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The purpose of this action is to secure a decree, declaring the property described in the complaint to be held in trust by the defendants for the plaintiff; that the deed under which the defendants hold said property be adjudged to have been obtained by fraud, and that the same is fraudulent, null and void, etc. In accordance with the allegations of the complaint and the prayer thereof, the decree adjudges that “the plaintiff is the owner in her own right and as her separate property of an undivided one-half interest” in the land described in the complaint; that “the defendant, W. 0.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tyler v. SanbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Golson v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Smith v. TownsendMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Benham v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cisco v. Van LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Young v. the Young Holdings Corp., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hemenway v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.