Thompson v. Bank of California
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs are heirs at law of William N. Thompson, deceased. Intervener A. N. Drown is administrator with the will annexed of the estate of said Thompson, deceased. Teresa Bell was .joined as a defendant in the ac-George Staacke, formerly executor of the will of said Bell, deceased, but was later substituted as administratrix with the will annexed of said Bell, and the action as to defendant George j Staacke, formerly executor of the will of said Bell, was dismissed. Objection was made by defendant Teresa Bell to plaintiffs prosecuting the action on the ground that Drown had been appointed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Morton v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re the Estate of LosheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- In re Estate of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sharpstein v. FriedlanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Schwarting v. ArtelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Church v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Cole v. Canadian Bank of CommerceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Kirk White & Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.