Legal Opinion

Beuré-Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1988No. 129-86LPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

This is a regulatory takings action. Plaintiff Beuré-Co.’s claim that its property was “taken” in violation of the fifth amendment is based on the Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) denial of permits that would authorize plaintiff to add fill to and to construct a mini-warehouse on a tract of land owned by plaintiff in Eagan, Minnesota. The case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion under RUSCC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(4) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s takings claim is not ripe for judicial review. For the reasons set forth herein,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Solar Turbines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Devon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. Forest Glen Properties, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API