Legal Opinion
Solar Turbines, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 31, 1989No. 53-88CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this government contract action filed pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 601, et seq., plaintiff, Solar Turbines, Inc. (Solar), seeks review of certain decisions by the Department of the Navy’s (the Navy) contracting officer. The action is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss under RUSCC 12(c) alleging lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the pleadings are not yet closed, a motion under Rule 12(c) is premature.1 Defendant’s motion, therefore, will be treated as a motion seeking dismissal under RUSCC 12(b)(1) for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Government Systems Advisors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Solar Turbines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Continental Collection & Disposal, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Foley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Cubic Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.