Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hummel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 2004No. SCBD 4736PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1106 OPINION

WATT, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 The Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (the Bar), filed a complaint against Respondent, Catheryn Hummel, a licensed attorney in Oklahoma, pursuant to Rule 6, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A., for violations of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (ORPC), 5 O.S.2001, Ch.l, App. 3-A. Counts I through Y represent grievances filed by five of Respondent’s former clients. Count VI is based on allegations raised by the Bar for her failure to respond to the grievance in Count V.

¶ 2 Respondent and the Bar stipulated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SchraederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GRAYSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API