State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Hummel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
*1106 OPINION
WATT, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 The Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (the Bar), filed a complaint against Respondent, Catheryn Hummel, a licensed attorney in Oklahoma, pursuant to Rule 6, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A., for violations of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (ORPC), 5 O.S.2001, Ch.l, App. 3-A. Counts I through Y represent grievances filed by five of Respondent’s former clients. Count VI is based on allegations raised by the Bar for her failure to respond to the grievance in Count V.
¶ 2 Respondent and the Bar stipulated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SchraederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GRAYSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.