Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Schraeder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 2002No. 4597PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: [1] Does .the record 1 submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? and [2] Is a license suspension for thirty (30) days an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

I

INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD

¶ 2 On 26 January 2001 the Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] commenced this disciplinary proceeding against Fred M. Schraeder [Schraeder or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GroshonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API