State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Schraeder
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: [1] Does .the record 1 submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? and [2] Is a license suspension for thirty (30) days an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
¶ 2 On 26 January 2001 the Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] commenced this disciplinary proceeding against Fred M. Schraeder [Schraeder or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GroshonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.