Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Neubert
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge HUME.
In this declaratory action to determine insurance coverage, defendant, Ronald S. Neu-bert, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (Metropolitan). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The following facts are undisputed. As a car insured by Metropolitan and occupied by the driver and three passengers was traveling on the street near defendant’s home, the driver was shot and the vehicle collided with a concrete post across the street from defendant’s home.
The trial court found, as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Sanchez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Automobile Insurance v. HoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. v. HauserColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Haskell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.