Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Neubert

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1998No. 97CA0785PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge HUME.

In this declaratory action to determine insurance coverage, defendant, Ronald S. Neu-bert, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (Metropolitan). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The following facts are undisputed. As a car insured by Metropolitan and occupied by the driver and three passengers was traveling on the street near defendant’s home, the driver was shot and the vehicle collided with a concrete post across the street from defendant’s home.

The trial court found, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Sanchez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. California Automobile Insurance v. HoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. v. HauserColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Haskell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API