Legal Opinion

California Automobile Insurance v. Hogan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2003No. B161245PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, J.

Defendants and cross-complainants, the legal heirs and estate of John V. Hogan, appeal the summary judgment entered in favor of respondent, California Automobile Insurance Company (CAIC), on respondent’s complaint for declaratory relief and appellants’ cross-complaint for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and professional negligence. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the fatal injuries Mr. Hogan suffered during an altercation with an uninsured motorist while exchanging information following a traffic accident are covered…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roque v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Cooksey v. ALEXAKISCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. August Entertainment, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Imperium Insurance v. Unigard InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. Safeco Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API