State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fisher
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
CERTIFICATION OF A QUESTION OF STATE LAW
This case involves the reach of Colorado’s uninsured motorist coverage (“UIM”). See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 10-4-609. The uninsured motorist provision of Mr. Fisher’s automobile insurance policy provides:
We will pay compensatory damages for bodily injury an insured is legally entitled to collect from the owner or driver of an uninsured motor vehicle. The bodily injury must be:
1. sustained by an insured; and
2. caused by an accident that involves the operation, maintenance, or use of an uninsured motor vehicle as a motor vehicle.
Aplt’s App.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jaramillo v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Spurlock v. TownesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- In re GroomsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.