Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fisher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 14, 2010No. 09-1415PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

CERTIFICATION OF A QUESTION OF STATE LAW

This case involves the reach of Colorado’s uninsured motorist coverage (“UIM”). See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 10-4-609. The uninsured motorist provision of Mr. Fisher’s automobile insurance policy provides:

We will pay compensatory damages for bodily injury an insured is legally entitled to collect from the owner or driver of an uninsured motor vehicle. The bodily injury must be:

1. sustained by an insured; and

2. caused by an accident that involves the operation, maintenance, or use of an uninsured motor vehicle as a motor vehicle.

Aplt’s App.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jaramillo v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Spurlock v. TownesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. In re GroomsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API