Legal Opinion
Haskell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 8, 2002No. CIV.01-00183 SOM/KSCPublished
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Plaintiff Earl Haskell (“Haskell”), a police officer shot by Peter Moses (“Moses”), sues for automobile insurance benefits to cover his injuries. Although neither Moses nor Haskell was in a car at the time of the shooting, Haskell contends that he has insurance coverage under the uninsured motorist provisions of two automobile policies. Because this court concludes that Haskell’s injuries did not arise out of the operation,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.