Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Nangle

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1984No. 7089PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

This appeal is from a superior court decision granting Paul and Cheryl Nangle (Nangles) recovery on a promissory note they held as assignees of the Alaska USA Federal Credit Union (Credit Union). The obligor on the $40,749.98 note was G. Dale Jackson. The superior court rejected all defenses which Jackson asserted and found him liable on the note and for $15,000 the Nangles had paid the Credit Union. This appeal followed.

I

In the mid-1970’s, the Nangles became co-owners of a group of eighty-five lots known as the Barnan Subdivision. In March 1976, the Nangles…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Milne v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Alaska Brick Company v. McCoyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API