Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Ek
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 2004No. S-10535PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Russell Peterson and Tyna Ek entered into a contract to renovate and sell a boat, the O’Hana Kai. Peterson breached the contract and Ek successfully brought a claim in the superior court to recoup damages resulting from the breach. Peterson appeals the decision of the superior court finding him liable to Ek for damages resulting from breach of contract, trespass to chattels, and attorney’s fees. We affirm the superior court in all respects.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
Tyna Ek and Russell Peterson met in Seattle during the summer of 1999. Ek was a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- GILBERT M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. BarbeeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.