People v. Hemple
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of' the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Nutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.
The defendant was charged with embezzling $142.50, convicted, moved for a new trial, which was denied, and was then sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.
He appeals from the order denying a new trial and from the judgment.
The charging part of the information is as follows: “The said George Hemple was agent and servant to one C. P. Hall, and being agent and servant as aforesaid, by virtue of his said employment as such agent and servant, there came into the care and control of the said George Hemple, for and on account of the said C. P. Hall, the sum of one hundred forty-two and fifty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Cussen v. Southern California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. MinkowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Waniorek v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.