People v. Gordon
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from orders denying a new trial and denying a motion in arrest of judgment. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Defendant was convicted of embezzlement. He moved in arrest of judgment, which motion being denied, he moved for a new trial. This motion was also denied, and hence this appeal. There was no demurrer to the information. It is not contended that the evidence fails to support the verdict.
1. The motion in arrest of judgment is based upon the ground that the information does not charge a public offense. The information, it is conceded, is in the language of the statute (Pen. Code, sec. 507); but it is claimed that the information is fatally defective, in that it fails to set forth the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. RiccardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- State v. DouglasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.