Waniorek v. United Railroads
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, denying a new trial. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was for damages for personal injuries and defendant had the verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial. • The facts deemed essential for a proper understanding of the case will appear as we proceed.
Among the instructions requested by plaintiff and refused by the court was the following: “If you believe from the evidence that on the twelfth day of February, 1903, and while plaintiff was being transported as a passenger on said car of said defendant, as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, by reason of the negligence of the defendant, the controller on…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Buel v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hart v. FarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Nawelo v. Von Hamm-Young Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913
- Jenks v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Forgeron Inc. v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Whyte v. Idora Park Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.