People v. Gallagher
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The appellant, Matthew Gallagher, was charged with having had morphine in his possession in violation of the state law regulating the sale and use of poisons, and upon trial before a jury was convicted. The accusation also charged and appellant admitted two prior convictions of felony, for having in a similar manner violated the same state law. Therefore, the maximum penalty under the present conviction was ten years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary.
At the trial appellant did not deny having had possession of said narcotic, but asserted that such possession was brought about…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. NewcomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- In Re MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. BarkdollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- People v. HempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- People v. McCraskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.