Legal Opinion
People v. Schroeder
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1919No. Crim. No. 681PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The appellant was convicted of embezzlement.
The opening brief is devoted largely to a discussion of the alleged insufficiency of the information to state the offense charged. The information, so far as its essential parts are concerned, is as follows:
“The said C. L. Schroeder is accused by the District Attorney of and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this information, of the crime of embezzlement, a felony, committed as follows: That the said C. L. Schroeder on or about the 15th day of November, 1917, at and in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, was the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- People v. McMahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. WaxmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. FronkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. EphraimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.