Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Salzman v. Salant & Salant, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 1, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

An informer’s action under sections 3490-3494 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231-235, may be maintained where the defendant has violated section 5438, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 80, 82-86, as that section read when it was adopted by reference into section 3490. United States ex rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corporation, 2 Cir., 83 F.2d 178. As section 5438 stood at the time of the enactment of section 3490 it forbade the presentation of false claims against the government or any department or officer thereof, and it also forbade any agreement, combination or conspiracy to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. SchaufflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States Ex Rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. McNinchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  5. People Ex Rel. Levenstein v. SalafskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API