United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
We share appellees’ righteous indignation at the conduct of the appellants. In fact their own counsel made no attempt in his argument to us to justify that conduct. We cannot, however, share appellees’ views of the applicable statute. The facts are not in dispute and may be simply stated. Federal funds were granted under the Public Works Administration to local municipalities and school districts in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania to be expended in public-works projects. The appellants, the officers and members of the Electrical Contractors Association of Pittsburgh,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Foust v. Munson Steamship LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Martin TiegerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Marple Community Record, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Union CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.