Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1941No. 748 CivilPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an informer’s action based on Section 5438 and Sections 3490 to 3494, inclusive, of Revised Statutes, 18 U.S.C.A. § 80, 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231-235, in relation to false claims against the United States. The case, on trial from December 2, 1940, to March 22, 1941, resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against all the defendants — except the defendant Carmack— in the sum of $315,100.91. All the defendants, except Carmack, have moved for judgment in their favor, non obstante veredicto, or, in lieu thereof, for a new trial.

The suit charges the Electrical…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Kensington HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. United States v. Ridglea State Bank, United States of America v. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API