Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Levenstein v. Salafsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 5, 2003No. 2-01-0378PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

This permissive interlocutory appeal (155 111. 2d R 308) requires us to construe the Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act (Act) (740 ILCS 175/1 et seq. (West 2000)). Relator, Joseph Levenstein, M.D., an employee of the College of Medicine-Rockford (College) of the University of Illinois-Chicago (University), filed a qui tarn complaint alleging that defendant, Bernard Salafsky, a College dean, violated the Act by knowingly presenting false claims to the University. Salafsky moved to dismiss (see 735 ILCS 5/2 — 619.1 (West 2000)), arguing that (1) the Act bars only false claims against the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. Costner v. URS Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. LatonaIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Lawrence M.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Illinois ex rel. Pusateri v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. United States ex rel. Geschrey v. Generations Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. State of Illinois ex rel. Pusateri v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. ex rel. Schad, Diamond and Shedden, P.C. v. QVC, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Holtz v. CrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API