Legal Opinion

Walker v. State ex rel. Laboyteaux

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1905No. 20,599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Fayette Circuit Court; Ferdinand S. Swift, Judge. Action by tbe State of Indiana, on tbe relation of Pearl Laboyteaux, against Joseph W. Walker. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p.. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a bastardy proceeding. The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The grounds of the motion urged upon us are refusing to permit appellant as a witness to testify to a statement made to him out of court contradicting the testimony of a witness placed upon the stand by him, and excluding from evidence a letter written by the relatrix to appellant.

*961. *95The relatrix testified that her child was begotten on the night of September 5, 1902. The theory of the defense *96was that one Burgess was the father of the child, and appellant testified that on the night…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blough v. ParryIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Conway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  4. Walker v. State ex rel. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  5. Rhodes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huntingdon v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Smith v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Walker v. State ex rel. LaboyteauxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Nussear v. BreedenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Mensing. v. CroterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API