Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mensing. v. Croter

California Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13714Published

1Dissent

PBESTON, J., dissenting.—

I dissent.

The following opinion by Mr. Justice Sturtevant of the District Court of Appeal sets forth my views on this case in better form than I could, and I adopt it as the basis of my dissent.

“The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to compel him to support her illegitimate son and alleged that the defendant was the father. He appeared and answered and a trial was had before the court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict against the defendant and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed under section 953a of the Code of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Maynard v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. GerekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Bjorn v. CreagerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API