Conway v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Delaware Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment sentencing him to prison for the crime of manslaughter.
He was jointly indicted with one George Melrose, and the-latter was permitted to testify as a witness. In this there was no error. At common law the weight of modern authority is, that an accomplice may testify for the prosecution,, if he consents to do so. A recent writer says : “A few cases decide that an accomplice who has not b'een indicted is competent ; but the great weight of authority raises no distinction between accomplices who have been, and those who have-not been indicted.”…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Stocking v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Gould v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Norton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Rogers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.