Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. 25,100PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The appellant David Smith, as a resident freeholder, voter, and taxpayer of Morel Township, Shelby County, filed a verified remonstrance in the commissioner’s court of that county alleging that the Albert Smith road in said township, which had been improved by grading, draining, and graveling by Herman C. Hill under a contract, had not been improved in accordance with the plans and specifications, and prayed that said road and improvement be not received and that all» claims for making said alleged improvement be rejected.

The board of county commissioners determined that there was an issue…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hudelson v. HudelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. CainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Registration & Management Corp. v. City of HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Heekin Can Co. v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. LIGHT v. Lend Lease Transportation Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API