Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for overtime pay brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1994). Pending is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and the Government’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs allege that the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) has wrongfully determined them to be exempt from the overtime pay provisions of the FLSA because they perform extensive supervisory functions. After briefing and oral argument, the court holds that plaintiffs are not entitled to overtime pay.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McMahan v. ADEPT PROCESS SERVICES, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Astor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Blanco v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006