Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 28, 1996No. 90-346CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action for overtime pay brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1994). Pending is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and the Government’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs allege that the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) has wrongfully determined them to be exempt from the overtime pay provisions of the FLSA because they perform extensive supervisory functions. After briefing and oral argument, the court holds that plaintiffs are not entitled to overtime pay.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McMahan v. ADEPT PROCESS SERVICES, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. Astor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Blanco v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API