Legal Opinion

McMahan v. ADEPT PROCESS SERVICES, INC.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 24, 2011No. Civil 2:10cv278PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR., Senior District Judge.

This case arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. Defendant Adept Process Services, Inc. (“APS”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”) on the ground that Plaintiffs’ asserted claims for overtime pay are expressly barred by 29 U.S.C. § 213(b)(6), which exempts from the FLSA’s overtime pay requirements “any employee employed as a seaman.” Docs. 21, 22; 29 U.S.C. § 213(b)(6). For the reasons contained herein, the Court GRANTS APS’s motion for summary judgment.

I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor v. Leslie N. Bedell and Blue Water Marine, Catering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Harbor Cruises LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  2. BONANNO v. HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
  3. Behnamian v. HirshfeldDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
  4. Central Laundry, LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
  5. Clarendon Regency IV, LLC v. Equinox Clarendon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API