Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 1999No. 96-93CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This overtime pay dispute is before the court after trial limited to the question of liability for a representative sample of plaintiffs. Trial was conducted June 9 through 15, 1999, in San Antonio, Texas and San Diego, California. Post-trial briefing is complete.
BACKGROUND
The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1994), requires an employer, including the federal government, to compensate an employee for overtime work at a rate of at least one-and-one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay. See id. § 207(a). However, “bona fide executive,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Shockley v. City of Newport NewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 2141 v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
- Billings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Angelo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.