Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 30, 1998No. 96-93PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This overtime pay dispute is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The motions have been fully briefed and argued, and are ready for disposition. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are or were approximately 300 “Supervisory Border Patrol Agents” and “Supervisory Aircraft Pilots” employed by the U.S. Border Patrol at grades ranging from GS-11 to GS-14.1 They worked an unknown amount of overtime but were not paid for it because defendant considers “Supervisory Border Patrol Agents” and “Supervisory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Michael Zumerling v. Donald J. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Riggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Billings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Billings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.