Ingram v. Wishkah Boom Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ohehalis county, Irwin, J., entered July 25, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of th® plaintiff, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.
In this action the respondent sued to recover damages for injuries to his real property, al*193leged to have been caused by the appellant in the operation of its sluice dams on the Wishkah river. After issue had been joined, a trial was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment for respondent, from which this appeal is taken.
The appellant first complains that the trial court erred in overruling its motion to make the complaint more definite and certain, and in refusing to require the respondent to furnish it with a bill.of particulars. The complaint alleged, in substance, that the appellant was a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- De Wald v. IngleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Turner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Watkinson v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bellingham v. LinckWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Barry v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- White v. CoddWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Gilson v. Cascade Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Johnson v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.