Legal Opinion

White v. Codd

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1905No. 5240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe superior court for Whitman county, O. F. Miller, J., entered March 19, 1904, after a hearing upon affidavits, granting a temporary injunction, in an action to. restrain the obstruction of a stream.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff isi the owner of one hundred and sixty acres of farming land, in Whitman county, through which flows the North Palouse river. Said river is navigable and a public highway for the purpose of driving and floating logs and timber products. The defendant, for about twenty-, six years last past, has been engaged in conducting logging operations on said river. The complaint charges that,

“For six years last past, to wit: for the years 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, 1902, and 1903, the said defendant was and *15now is engaged in the logging business above said land, upon land lying on and near…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Monroe Mill Co. v. MenzelWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Matthews v. Belfast Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ingram v. Wishkah Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Watkinson v. McCoyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Barry v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gilson v. Cascade Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kalama Electric Light & Power Co. v. Kalama Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API