Legal Opinion

Bellingham v. Linck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1909No. 7411PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered December 28, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action to foreclose a lien for material and labor furnished in plumbing a building of the defendants in Tacoma. A trial of the cause upon the merits resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants for the sum of $396.10, which, less $18, was decreed to be a lien upon the property of defendants. We will notice the facts so far as necessary in connection with each error discussed.

Counsel for appellants contend that the summons shows a fatal defect upon its face, in that it did not state any place for the service of the defendants’ answer or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Powell v. NolanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cogswell v. West Street & North End Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Turner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Gaffner v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Polk v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pylate v. HadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Norton v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API