Barry v. Murray
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondent, being the owner of a tract of land abutting on the Snoqualmie river, in King county, Washington, brought this action against appellants, as defendants, to recover for damages alleged to have been caused to his land by the operations of appellants in floating logs down the river, and for an injunction to restrain appellants from acts of omission or commission which might cause future damage. From *671a judgment entered against them, after a trial on the merits to the court, in the sum of $375 and costs, and the granting of an injunction requiring the immediate clearing of the stream of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burrows v. Grays Harbor Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Field v. Apple River Log Driving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- White River Log & Booming Co. v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Mitchell v. Lea Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Davis v. WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Lasell v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Stidell v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Drainage District No. 6 v. Snohomish River Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927