Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1905No. 5775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered March 21, 1905, in favor of the defendant, after a hearing on the merits, confirming an assessment for local improvements.-

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Pierce county, confirming an assessment made by the city of Tacoma upon the appellants’ lots, for the improvement of South 0 street in said city. The improvement extends from Division avenue, on the north, to South Seventh street, on the south, and consists of an asphalt roadway and concrete curb and sidewalks, together with some necessary retaining walls. The property involved in this appeal is located in block 1, which is bounded by said 0 street on the east. The block is also bounded on the north by Division avenue, on the west by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. GilchristWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. De Wald v. IngleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Ingram v. Wishkah Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Berg v. Humptulips Boom & River Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Turner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. King County v. JoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API