Legal Opinion

Watkinson v. McCoy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1900No. 3591PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Skagit County. — Hon. Jesse P. Houser, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C.J.

This was an action in the superior court of Skagit county, brought by respondents to recover damages from appellants on account of using the Sainish river for storing and holding logs, and asking a permanent injunction against the future use of the river for storing and holding logs. Respondents recovered judgment for $175 damages and obtained an injunction prohibiting the use of the Samish river for holding, handling, assorting, or booming logs. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint for the reason that it failed to allege that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Weaver v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Hueston v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Rogers v. Coal River Boom & Driving Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ArlandWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Matthews v. Belfast Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ingram v. Wishkah Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Barry v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. White v. CoddWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API