Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Brunt
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 28, 2002No. 3:01CV1121(WWE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
This action arises pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for alleged violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; Connecticut General Statutes (“C.G.S.”) § 46a-60 et seq.; and a state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The plaintiff alleges that the defendants promoted a hostile work environment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and the due process and equal protection laws of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. Derby Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Desardouin v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Copeland v. Home & Community Health Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Tilley v. Anixter Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003