Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 11, 1952No. 746PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHill, J.

The defendants’ petition for certiorari is denied. The certificate they seek to have brought up was no part of the record when it was certified to this Court. It was made without notice and the Court was then without jurisdiction to settle the case on appeal, of which the exhibits offered in evidence are or would be an essential part. Russos v. Bailey, 228 N.C. 783, 47 S.E. 2d 22.

The judge undertook to settle the case on appeal at the time judgment was signed. When, however, oral evidence is offered, the judge cannot settle the case on appeal by an anticipatory order. Indeed, in such case, be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Russos v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Jones v. . FullbrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Leatherman v. LeathermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Janicki v. LorekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Hoffman v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API